Showing posts with label .22 LR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label .22 LR. Show all posts

13 June 2025

The Smith and Wesson Model 17 - A Little Update

This is a continuation from my first article on the Smith and Wesson Model 17-9

 I don't know how many rounds I've actually put through my Smith and Wesson Model 17-9 Masterpiece. I have tried to shoot it every time I head out to the Little Farm but I do know that I am working through the 2000 round case of Aguila Standard Velocity I got for it plus the big ammo test.

The first issue I had ran into was a user error and I had forgotten that I could adjust the rear sight. After getting the sights zeroed for around 25 yards, I am able to regularly hit a 6 inch steel gong off hand with various loads. While the Aguila load is not the most accurate from the 17, it's what I will be shooting for the foreseeable future along with another test load from Remington. The gun club I'm apart of has a 100 yard rimfire range. On a few occasions, I have sat down and made attempts at hitting the various steel gongs and been successful on the much larger ones. I don't know how big they are at the moment. I did, however, spur my interest to find a more accurate load which spawned the ammo test. 

I very much like the single action trigger pull but I still haven't figured out how to nail staging the double action trigger. I tend to pull through.

Somethings I've noticed with the high polish blue finish is that it dulls quickly. The muzzle area definitely wears from rubbing while in the holster.  I try to clean it when I'm done for the day but I can never really get it back to that same shininess. Given that this is my first deep polished blued pistol, it does make me sad to see holster wear but that's the name of the game. 

I also deleted the ILS with a TK Custom kit. Installing the kit was a good exercise in patience and base level gunsmithing. Getting the side plate off was fine and removing the hammer and other parts just fine. Putting in the plug took some effort but I was able successfully install the kit. Getting the gun back together was tricky. Specifically the new-style stirrup and which way it was supposed to go.  I had installed in wrong and the trigger pull was terrible. Once I figured out what I had done wrong, I had to find a way to get the side plate back on. I learned I was being impeded by the hammer block. Once I figured out how to set it, everything went back together just wonderfully. 

 The finishes don't match which makes me wonder if TK Custom sent me a matte kit and not a polished black kit. The box has no markings to tell you which one it is. Speaking of TKC, I've found several other of their K frame .22 products and it's got me thinking about a Model 617 10-shot as a Steel Challenge Rimfire division gun. Griffin Gun Club hosts Steel Challenge matches regularly. 



The ILS delete was successful.

Additionally, I added a plastic T-grip to fill in the undercut. It's not an original Tyler Grip. Ordering the official metal ones is sort of sketchy and I wish they would update the ordering process.

Additionally, I never did hear back from Smith and Wesson about the Master trigger job and if the Masterpiece has that level of treatment built in.

As part of the Big Ammo Test, I sat down at the Griffin Gun Club and tried 9 loads. I have the pictures but I feel as if I can do better. I forgot how far I set the target and I didn't measure the shot sizes. I also didn't run everything over a chronograph so I will be revisiting this soon. Below are the groups I shot that day.



Federal Champion 40 grain the Aguila High Velocity 40 grain
 

Eley HV Hollow Point 38 Gain and CCI Mini Mag 40 gr round nose 


Remginton SuperV 

The last time I tested ammo which was in the original article, I had different results. The CCI Mini Mags did pretty good. I had hoped the Eley HV Hollow Points had done better. They performed very well in a ballistic gel test and mushroomed nicely. I was wanting to be able to hunt with them. The Aguila did have some stringing but that could have been me. The new Remington SuperV load has been disappointing on all points. I have an article I'm working on for it but I want to get that test a better shake down but it won't be replacing my CCI Standard Velocity anytime soon. 

So far, the Smith and Wesson Model 17-9 Masterpiece has become a favorite of mine. I still have plenty of the Aguila Standard Velocity and Remington SuperV bulk box for plinking. I also had ordered around 300 rounds of the Eley HV and still plan to zero and carry the gun with those for now. Maybe I can try to small game hunt with it this fall.

04 September 2024

The CZ 457 Scout - 5 Years of Ownership

 In my previous article on the CZ 457 Scout, I claimed that the Scout was the Perfect Plinker. I've probably used that term a little too loosely over the years but at the time, I think I was onto something. Since then, I've picked up a few more rifles such as the Chiappa LA322 and finished the build out of the Ruger 10/22. I still stand by my statement of the rifle being suppressed and manually operated. Until the LA322 build is complete, the CZ 457 Scout is probably the closest to the Perfect Plinker as I can get for now. I will say this, if you like bolt actions more than you like lever actions or semi-autos, I think the CZ 457 Scout is just for you. Let me show you some of the updates that I've made over the last 5 years.


The first big change from the September 2019 article is that I now have a .22 specific silencer to use on the 1/2x28 threads. The El Camino from Q is lightweight and user serviceable and seems good at it's job. I don't have any other .22 silencers or tools to meter and quantify my experience but so far, everything is going well. Its the only .22 suppressor I have so I gets used on many different guns. Someday, I'll own several more and will be able to dedicate a can to various rifles. 



At 4 oz, the Q El Camino is light on weight but big on funny names. That's a theme with Q.

I also added a sling to the rifle as I think all long guns need a sling. Those two things by themselves are about as much as I really need but I did add one more leather product. A cartridge cuff. The leather cartridge cuff is an inexpensive unit that holds 16 rounds of .22 LR in loops. To accommodate the round count, the cuff is rather long and includes rubber shims or spacers. In this instance, I needed all 4 spacers as the short stock leaves too much play in the cuff. Ultimately, this does make the rifle fit me better but once children become apart of my life, I can take off the cuff as needed. We're a few years away before the first one reaches an appropriate age for this firearm.



I usually have the cuff filled with Winchester 36 grain HP for small game as needed.

Originally, I had intended to just use the original iron sights but due to an interesting situation, I was able to purchase an ADE pistol red dot from an Amazon bin store. I got the dot for $4. Additionally, I picked up a picatinny to dovetail adapter and an inexpensive mount and installed on the Scout. I zeroed for 25 yards to keep it simple and quiet using the CCI Standard Velocity.



The dot sits a little more proud than I like.

I know that the red dot conflicts with the open sights part of the concept but when I found out the red dot was the RMSc footprint and not the Doctor/Noblex footprint, I found I wasn't going to be able to use it on anything else at the moment as all my mounts are the Doctor/Noblex pattern. So far, I haven't found a dedicated 11mm dovetail to RMSc mount to replace the current setup with. This works for now.



I will always prefer a dedicated mount but sometimes nothing exists. You have to make one or make due.

That rounds up all the changes I've made since the September 2019 article. All together, the rifle is still very lightweight and easy to carry. As a matter of fact, the rifle with everything is just under 6.5 pounds. What I love about it is that it isn't super long and is lots of fun to shoot. When I carry this rifle, it makes me want to put together a super lightweight hunting rifle like a Rossi R92.

Review 

Over the last 5 years, I haven't found much that I am unhappy with regarding the CZ 457 Scout. In fact, I have zero complaints about this rifle. It's just simply a great rifle. I have not yet made use of the modularity of the rifle such as the easy to swap barrels or easy to replace stock. I've just been happy with it in both stock and accessorized versions.



The 10 round magazines stick out a bit and can get hung up while carrying. I suggest the 5 round for field use.

The wood is of good quality and seems to have good fitment to the receiver. I might like a little texture on the wrist if that was an option. The iron sights are easy to use though a little chunky. They remind me more of pistol sights than rifle sights. The front sight tunnel is open on the top to let light in, which I appreciate. The chunky rear sight appears to be adjustable for windage but I haven't felt the need to correct them as it seems regulated well enough. 

At first, when I got the rifle and found that it only had a single shot sled, instead of a magazine, I was a little annoyed. That said, I have found that when I'm plinking way, I don't always want to reload magazines and using the sled keeps things moving. It may be slow but that's fine for casual. If I want to hunt or crank out a few rounds, I can load the 5 or 10 round magazines I have for the rifle. One a side note, there is a very long 25 round magazine that would be fun to get ahold of. The magazines are all single stack so they tend to get long.

I have put a large but unknown number of rounds through this rifle and have had no issues. It's a bolt action so there isn't any ammunition related sensitivities that I need to worry about. The magazines feed just fine when I want to use them. The rifle has been setup for various situations before the current setup. At one point, I had a scope on it for my oldest niece to go squirrel hunting. That was short lived. The current setup just lends itself better to casual plinking a short range field use. 

All in all, this rifle has turned out to be simply fantastic. The current setup is easy to understand and is very user friendly. With a good silencer and ammo, the rifle is quiet. If you are looking for a .22 LR rifle for light use or for training kids on, I would recommend considering one for your inventory. 

17 August 2024

My Nearly Perfect Plinker - The Chiappa LA322 Takedown Carbine Threaded

 In January 2024, Chiappa very quietly posted on their website a new version of their LA322 lever action 22 LR rifle. I only found out about it because I happened along and noticed it. This was a takedown carbine that was advertised as having a 1/2x28 threaded 18.5 inch barrel. The only thing it was missing was open sighs. I suppose it was intended to have a scope or red dot. Minus the missing sights, the rifle looks exactly the way I've been wanting. Wood stocks, blued steel and a threaded barrel for a silencer. I go over this concept a bit in my article called My Dream Plinker. My tastes have definitely changed as I thought my CZ 457 Scout was the Perfect Plinker but my love of lever action rifles has reigned king. I kept an eye out to see when the new version of the LA322 would be available. As it turns out, they started shipping fairly quickly and many options for under $350. I jumped on one.

The LA322 threaded from the factory is not the fully realized Dream Plinker or Perfect Plinker. There are a few missing things such as the 12 inch barrel and open sights. Those are things that can be fixed as needed. Chiappa does have part numbers for replacement parts on their website but after further digging and looking over parts diagrams, adding a front sight will be tricky.




Problems

This project ran into several problems that I attempted to work through. Some of them are such a problem that I've had to rethink the total project and is sort of stuck in limbo.

The first issue I wanted to address was the lack of open sights. It does have the usual dovetail rail on the receiver for a scope. On rifles such as the Henry 22, the front barrel band also has the front sight integrated. The LA322 is similar, however, there is also a cap that covers the muzzle that is molded into the component. If you look at the muzzle of the Kodiak Cub model, you'll have an easier time seeing what I am talking about. The front sight, barrel band and muzzle cap are all cast as one metal piece. I was originally hoping that I could modify the regular barrel band and add a Skinner rear sight.


Muzzle cap of the Kodiak Cup. The metal parts are stainless or silver finished but the cap is cast metal.

The parts diagram of the rifle shows that the barrel is stepped down in diameter and that the front sight cap slides over the muzzle. The barrel on the threaded model doesn't appear to have that step-down and a different band is used. The replacement front sight will need to be modified to work correctly by cutting off the cap at the point where the cap meets the band and remove material from under the sight base to let the barrel slide into the ring. I needed to order parts number 39 and 40 from Chiappa then make the needed changes. It's not as simple as I was hoping this would be. Thankfully, I was able to get both the front sight and the tunnel. Part number 39 was modified but an expected issue came up that I will explain later on.



Front sight from the parts diagram

The rear sight on the regular LA322 is a traditional buckhorn sight dovetailed into the barrel. This version of the rifle doesn't have that dovetail cut in the barrel. It does have the usual 11mm or 3/8 inch rail on the receiver. That's perfect as I had planned on using a Skinner rear aperture sight like I have on the Henry. The first major snag I ran into, however, is that the receiver is rounded on the top. The Skinner Rimfire sight uses a flat base. It won't fit. After doing additional research, I later found that the William WGRS-54 sight should work for what I have in mind but I would have to order more parts.

On to the second issue. For the most part, there is a very logical reason that having a threaded barrel on a lever action .22 LR rifle with a full length magazine isn't usually a thing. Most .22 silencers measure approximately 1 inch in diameter. That means that the lower rear portion of the silencer body is obstructing the magazine tube. To load one of these rifles, you remove the tube by rotating the knob to unlock the inner part. Then you pull the tube toward the muzzle and load cartridges, nose-forward into the cartridge shaped slot on the magazine tube body. 



The extended barrel band included with the rifle allows the inner part to clear the silencer.

If a silencer is threaded on, the tube will not likely clear the silencer. You have to remove the silencer from the barrel, remove the tube, load the magazine, reinsert the tube and screw on the silencer. That's a cumbersome way to plink. I attempted to confirm that the tube would not clear the silencer the day I took home the rifle. I did find something very interesting though. My rifle's thread pitch was not 1/2x28 as advertised. I suspected the pitch was 1/2x20, the usual European pattern and these are Italian made guns. I reached out to Chiappa to confirm. They confirmed that a number of these rifles were shipped with European spec barrels. They offered to RMA the rifle and provided a shipping label to replace the barrel. It took a few months to get the rifle back. 

Once in hand, I was pleasantly surprised to find that they had corrected this issue but I did run into a new problem. The threaded section is very long. In fact, it's so long that the silencer doesn't screw down far enough to seat on the shoulder. Thankfully, Q includes a spacer they said would be needed for this sort of issue. I also found Chiappa had used a barrel band that was extended enough to push the magazine tube below the silencer body. I can remove the tube without removing the silencer. For me to continue to pursue the build with open sights, I would have to use the shorter, modified barrel band. This now means that the magazine tube and silencer body would interfere with each other as stated above.

There are a few ways to bypass this issue but the best solution is to use a narrow diameter silencer. The smallest diameter rimfire silencer I know of is AB Suppressor's Little Bird. I know of at least one person who did a similar build with a Henry Silver Boy (See pnw_pew on Instagram) and the Little Bird. Since I don't own a Little Bird, I need another solution. 

Enter Griffin Armament. Griffin Armament makes a nifty quick detach system called CAM-LOK. It's almost like an interrupted thread system that allows for a fast on and off removal of a silencer. Normally, the system is for recoil operated pistols to use a suppressor and have a quick attach and detach system. 

For example, I have a CAM-LOK piston in my Dead Air booster assembly. I can put that booster into my Primal or Wolfman. I have a few semi-auto pistols in different calibers that have the CAM-LOK muzzle adapters. I can take the Primal with the piston and quick attach it to a 9mm pistol with an adapter and fire, then move the silencer to my .45 ACP pistol with adapter. This occurs  without issue and no changes to the piston are needed. They also have a universal direct thread adapter in 1/2x28. That adapter was the key to making this whole build easier to work with given the shorter barrel band.

By using that adapter on my Q El Camino, I would have been able to attach and remove the silencer for loading quickly and easily. Together, the system is about $140 which is a little more expensive than the Gemtech 4 lug system but I already had an extra CAM-LOK adapter in 1/2x28 from another gun I no longer have. I just needed the universal adapter for the silencer side of the system which is $79 on their website. With the Griffin Armament CAM-LOK system, I can remove and attach the silencer for easy loading. That's one problem solved. 

At least that's what I thought.

Because the Skinner sight doesn't fit the receiver and I don't have the Williams sight and the front barrel band doesn't slide on just yet and needs additional milling to clean up, I'm not able to pursue the open sights part of this build at the moment.

Additionally. if I do use the sighted front band, I will absolutely loose the convivence of keeping the silencer attached for reloading. I'm becoming less interested in this idea the more I use the rifle. At this point, the CAM-LOK idea is pretty much out of the running.

After running into these issues during the assembly phase of the project, I just wanted to run the gun and see how it would be. I just wanted to enjoy my new rifle. I screwed the silencer onto the rifle with the spacer, installed the beautiful Mason Leather stock cuff on the rifle and clipped on the Uncle Mike's magazine tube sling stud. I will need to install the other sling stud later on. I still needed a sighting system.



The Mason Leather 22 stock cuff that's just beautiful. This holds a 50 round box of 22 LR.


How Is It?

I borrowed an ADE Spike 4 MOA red dot from my CZ457 Scout and modified the picatinny to dovetail adapter to fit the round receiver. It was a very sloppy job but it works for the time being. I zeroed the rifle for 36 yards. 

My initial impressions shooting this rifle is that there is nothing like a lever action .22 LR with a tube full of CCI Standard Velocity and a good silencer attached. Even in just the stock configuration without my fully realized Dream Plinker, the LA322 with a red dot and silencer is fantastically fun to shoot. Honestly, from just the short time I've been able to enjoy the rifle, I recommend it but with caveats.

I like that it looks like a Marlin 39A in passing but internally it is anything but a Marlin.

What I don't like is how cheap the finish feels. It's nice looking but it's not a steel receiver that's finely finished and blued, like a Marlin 39A. Then again, you aren't paying for that and the street price is sure nice. It's very accessible.

The action isn't gritty or rough, it's smooth but it's not light like my Henry is as if there is friction slowing it down. I suppose that will take time to loosen up with use. The manual does recommend a 100 to 150 round break in period.

Future

I'm not sure that I will able to realize this project to it's fullest for a while but I will continue to think it over. The Perfect Plinker concept would need for me to trim down the barrel to 12 inches or so. That will take a lot of work as the magazine needs shortened as well. It also requires the $200 NFA tax and registration. I'm torn on doing the paperwork, the Form 1, to make that happen. I don't like registrations and I don't like paying taxes on Constitutional rights. Many .22 LR loads don't actually need a barrel length in excess of 12 inches, something I go over in another article you can read about shorter barrels. I would also need to engrave the receiver per certain rules. Incidentally, the modified barrel band couldn't be used anyway as a 12 inch barrel would shorter than there is room for. That brings me to the next part of this.

The open sights problem has presented me with something to think over given that my initial idea didn't work. Should I actually choose to pursue the open sights again, the Williams WGRS-54 sight will need to be tested. I had hoped that the barrel band modification would work but after additional consideration, milling a dovetail into the front of the barrel and installing a more traditional gold bead sight seems to be the better idea. This would allow me to keep the stock barrel band and allow the tube to clear the silencer. I do just happen to have an extra Marbles front sight from the Winchester restoration project. I will inquire with my trusted locals to see if we can mill a dovetail into the barrel. That said, I think that I will wait until I decide to commit to shortening the barrel. It doesn't make much sense to run out and modify the barrel then have to make the same dovetail cut again.

Summary

I never expected that a company would actually make a carbine length lever action .22 LR rifle with a threaded barrel but I am sure glad that Chiappa did it. The bonus with the LA322 is two fold. First, it looks like a Marlin 39A which is a bucket list or "Someday Gun" for me. The second bonus is that this LA322 is a takedown model. That means I can undo the side screw to disassemble the rifle for easy transport and cleaning.

The downsides of the LA322 are the limitations on rimfire accessories due to the rounded receiver. If you are trying to use a scope, make sure that your rings will work. Note that the rifle was intended for that particular setup. You will also need to be selective about what mounts you are using if you plan on using anything picatinny-based. The cheap internal adapters from Amazon will require heavy modification and I don't recommend this method at all as it will scratch up your new receiver's finish. Something that I didn't know about until after the fact is the UTG RDM-20 dovetail mount. These are a Docter footprint, low profile dovetail mount (part number is RDM-20XSD) that are designed for this sort of application though it does sit higher than what I would like. I absolutely wish I had known about this part before I started modifying the adapter. Lesson learned.

Additionally, the takedown system is currently tight but the tab that slots into the receiver has a little vertical play in it when you apply pressure to the two halves of the rifle. It isn't an issue now but I will be keeping an eye on it.

If you want something similar to this but are on a tight budget, Rossi makes a version of their Rio Bravo called the Tactical. It has a 16 inch threaded barrel and comes with a picatinny rail section for a red dot or scope. It also has sling studs. I wouldn't say that the Chiappa is expensive by any means but the Rossi is just a bit cheaper. The Rio Bravo also doesn't look as nice with the plastic furniture. The Henry Frontier Threaded is still the best turnkey solution for this sort of thing as it has everything needed out of the box. It'll probably the quietest as well with that long barrel. I just don't want that long of a barrel and is about $125+ more in street price. I really do like the carbine length barrels.

So is the LA322 the Perfect Plinker? I think it's pretty darn close. It's inexpensive, looks nice and can be configured with the best of accessories with a little bit of research and effort. Maybe you like a bolt-action or a semi-auto but I like a lever action and so far, the LA322 is pushing all the right buttons. Stay tuned for more Chiappa LA322 content. 

Update JAN 2025 post SHOT Show: I did learn that Savage's Revel Deluxe will come with iron sights and a threaded barrel from the factory which was information not available back in 2024. If you want a turnkey solution, that will be it.

27 January 2024

No One Makes a Traditional, High Quality .22 Rifle in the US Anymore

 I've been enjoying my Smith and Wesson model 17, that you can read more about it here but started thinking about getting a rifle to pair it up with. I don't know what I would get but I know that I want it to be just as nice and high quality as the S&W. The deep and high polish bluing on the barrel, frame and cylinder are gorgeous. A rifle to match needs to have the same deep, beautiful bluing and pretty wood stocks. That shouldn't be all that hard to find right? What options are out there? Let's setup some parameters. First is the styling. High polished, blued steel and wood stocks. That's easy enough but I'd like it to be US made. That's all we're looking for. A perfect match to what Smith and Wesson did with the model 17.



If we think over the old US brands like Remington, Winchester, Browning and Savage, if the brand is making rimfire rifles, none of them are US made. For example, Remington has not yet started making a rimfire rifle since the return from the bankruptcy. Winchester and Browning brand rimfire rifles aren't made in the US. The Winchester Wildcat is made in Turkey but I can't confirm if that's the case with the Xpert or the new Ranger lever action. Browning's .22 rifles, other than the Buck Mark, are made by Miroku in Japan (they are well made by the way). Mossberg's .22 rifles are made in Brazil. 


Screens shot of the Browning website
https://www.browning.com/support/faq/firearms-manufactured.html

The Buck Mark rifle doesn't fit into our category as it's not a high polish bluing. It's also not traditionally laid out. So make that one more requirement. Basically, we're looking for something like either a US made Browning T-Bolt or a current production Marlin 39A. Neither of those exist currently.

Browning's T-bolt Sporter straight pull rimfire (from their product page)

Well as we have seen, the T-bolt is made in Japan. The Marlin isn't made anymore sadly. CZ, who makes one of my favorite rimfires, the 457, is operating in Czechia (formerly the Czech Republic). You would think then that Savage, of all the old guard, are still making these rifles in the US, right? Negative. The rimfire rifles are made in the home of the maple leaf, Canada. Well, shucks. 

Who else is left? Ruger and Henry are the only big names with rifles that match the criteria. They are, as of January 2024, the only two big manufactures of rimfire rifles making the guns here in the USA, or so I thought. Smith and Wesson, Christensen Arms, Volquartson, Vudoo Rifleworks, Keystone Arms, TPS, Keltec and other are making .22 LR rifles in the US. I had plum forgot outright until I started thinking it over. None of them have the deep bluing and wood stocks I'm looking for. 

That blows my mind. 

Alright then. What's wrong with the Henry or the Ruger? They're inexpensively made. They are not on the same "level" as the Smith and Wesson is. I'm not saying the Henry's or Ruger rifles are bad. I have both the H001 and Ruger American Rimfire. I enjoy both rifles. 


The Henry has the aesthetic I'm looking for but if you do a close inspection of the parts and how the rifle is made, the Model 17 revolver is a wildly different product. The inside parts of the Henry are a sort of internal frame. The actual receiver is not a finely polished and machined part. It's also not the part you see. The outside part where you put the scope is actually a shell. In the image above, the two screws seen on the rifles side are two of five screws that when undone, allow access to the inside of the rifle. It slides up and off. The engineering is clever and helps keep costs down but it's not the same machined quality like the Smith and Wesson revolver is. 

Ruger is doing sort of the same thing with the American Rimfire. My current RAR had issues with the sights indicating issues with quality control. I could make mine work but a gunsmith would have to fill in the holes where the front and rear sight go then re-blue and change the stock entering into the world of custom guns. I would have to replace the synthetic stock. While the rifle is accurate, again, it's just not the same as the Smith and Wesson revolver in terms of quality and craftsmanship. My 10/22 is also not the same quality as the Model 17. 

I started asking around and so far, no one has come up with an answer other than find a used Marlin 39A or similar older gun. I won't say that a firearm has to be expensive to be good. That's just not true but you do pay for quality guns. 

I haven't decided on a companion rifle yet but I do know that the Marlin 39A over the last year or so, has become a sort of bucket list gun for me. My biggest worry is that the Marlin 39A has become a sort of unicorn gun, mythical maybe, to many in the gun community. Ever since the Remington bankruptcy, Marlin stopped making those rifles. If you want one, it's going to be used. You may end up paying over $1000 for a rifle that you have to put money into. Thankfully, Gun Broker has many options for the 39A but I'm looking into other options. Remington used to make a really nice rifle called the 547 in their custom shop. It would be nice to see Remington get back to work but when I talked to Remington, they didn't have anything they shared coming up, so no rimfires from Remington just yet. I'm also looking around for custom makers but I wonder if Marlin will bring back the 39A before I actually can afford something. 

Speaking of custom options, I think I found one. Parkwest Arms announced recently that they are going to release a made to order bolt action .22 LR called the SD-22. There aren't many details so far. The images they posted on Instagram show a case hardened receiver which is a fine alternative to the deep bluing. Currently, the barrel appears to be a matte finish but I'm pretty sure you'd be able to request a polished blue. I spoke with Jason at Parkwest Arms and confirmed a few details. The base price of the rifle is $5995. The receiver and bolt are completely made in-house and can be ordered in right or left handed. For mounting a scope, the rifle includes Talley bases. The wood stock is an absolutely stunning Claro walnut that's been hand rubbed for a shiny oiled finish. It includes a 1/2 inch recoil pad. There is also checkering included. 

The barrel on the SD-22 comes from Shilen uses a sport contour with a Bentz chamber. That specific chamber keeps things accurate while still being able to use most ammunition sold on the market. Usually its geared toward semi-auto rifles. 

To achieve what I am looking for, I would add the high polish option and 1/2x28 threading. The polishing is an additional $975 and the threaded in $175. I'm looking at around $7200. If you were interested in the case hardening, that's an additional $795. There is an entire list of additional options. 

If you are interested in the sort of rifle I'm looking for but want what is likely the highest quality .22 LR rifle made in the US with traditional furniture, you need to talk to Parkwest Arms. Sadly, that price tag is currently outside the price point of what this would be homesteader can afford. I was looking for something the average Joe can afford. 

Anyway, this was less about me buying something than it is about the loss of US manufacturing. Then again, that's old news. 

15 July 2018

Ruger 10/22 - Ubiquitous Excellence

The Ruger 10/22 is one of the firearms that is extraordinarily pervasive throughout the US. As a well made, yet inexpensive .22 LR semi-auto rifle, the Ruger 10/22 has been made by the millions and sold probably everywhere that such firearms are legal to own on Earth. There are third party companies making literally every part including receivers. It's been made in a variety of rimfire calibers and can be found at just about any gun shop in the US. People love them and customize the snot out of them.

And I never owned one.

Until now. About mid-way though 2018 I signed up for the Appleseed Project two day class in Macon where you need a rifle with good irons and a sling. They suggest a .22 rifle for it's cheap and plentiful ammunition as you need around 500 rounds for the two day event. I was planing on taking my ProjectCarbine and a .22 LR. The Ruger American Rimfire would have been a good choice but the iron sights were installed incorrectly from the factory. I purchased a new 10/22 with walnut stock and had the local gun shop install swivel studs for a sling. It's Ruger's basic carbine with 18 inch barrel and wood stock (PN# 1103).

I've owned semi auto .22s for years. The Stevens 62 was the first rifle I ever owned and still have it but it never struck me as a great rifle despite not having any real trouble with it. The Smith and Wesson M&P 15-22 was loads of fun but I traded it years ago for something more important. It's also currently banned from Appleseed Project classes. The older Marlin 60 I have would make for a great truck gun but not necessarily the best choice for the class due to the tube magazine. I decided to pick up the Ruger to see what all the hype was about.

After learning a little bit about what the 10/22 is and it's design, I can completely agree with the people. I get it. The Ruger 10/22 is simple. It is devilishly simple. The way the barrel mates to the receiver blew my mind once I saw it. Two bolts. That's it. Just two bolts hold the barrel to a point on the receiver and it works so well. You can tear a 10/22 down with simple hand tools sitting on your couch. You can literally build a new one from entirely aftermarket parts while binge watching Netflix from your living room without a workbench or vice in a few hours.

The customization options are outrageous. From heavy barrels and caliber conversion to hand crafted wood stocks or cool-guy stocks that make it look like a G36, a P90 or even a M249. Some where even converted to full auto with absurd cyclic rates. They have target models, take-down models and even a pistol version called the Charger. 

Bill Ruger truly nailed it with the 10/22.

I have a low round count (about 150 rounds) with the rifle since purchasing it but so far I've enjoyed it. I can absolutely see building a fully customized rifle in the future and even have plans to do so.

I completely recommend the Ruger 10/22 for everyone.


21 September 2014

Long Range Range Day - Ammo Testing

Today's shoot was actually pretty fruitful. I was able to acquire a 100 round box of CCI Mini Mag 40 grain CPRN to test earlier in the week and finally got a chance to try them out. I would have to say they seem to be just as consistent as the Eley Club Xtra I shot a few weeks back. Every group I shot today ended up in around 2.5 inches exactly. It's kind of freaky. 



Several of those groups have three rounds right next to or touching each other (one group has 2 rounds through the same hole) with 1 of the other 2 rounds being a flier and the last being closer to the main group. However, one of the groups seemed to be complete BS. Half the shots weren't even on the 6 inch target... IDK what happened there because the next group had the shots through the same hole. Go figure.

I had another box of this ammo I had bought a few years ago so I have a little over 100 more rounds to test with. I will see if the groups stay the same. If they do that means I can use these as backup ammo to the Eley Club Xtra. The Club Xtra seem to produce groups around 1.8 inches from my rifle but it's expensive at around $13 for 50 rounds. These CCI 0030 seem to be around $20 for 100 rounds and it appears to be easier to find. 

I also took the Air Hawk out for zeroing. It didn't go as well as I was hoping. The scope will need to be replaced as none of the adjustments had predictable outcomes. I found a spot that was close but the gun shot high left. Any adjustments would bring one round close to zero but the second shot would go right back to were I started from. The rings are also junk. I will need to get some rings specific for 11mm dovetail mounts and not these 11mm to 13 or 14mm multi-use rings the gun came with.

I really like the stock on the Air Hawk, BTW. It is SOO much better than the stock on the American Rimfire. I will DEFINITELY be replacing the stock on my American. I will add pics later.

Update: I chose one of the targets for my record book. A rough measure of the group shows the first 3 shots I took produced a group of approximately 5/8 inch. The next shot totally ruined the awesomeness, giving me a total size of approximately 2.5 inches from a distance of 100 yards. The fifth round land about half an inch from the small group between the small group and flier. I tell you, I wanted to stop SOOOO bad after shooting those first 3 rounds. If I had though, that would have been cheating and I can't accept that.

18 September 2014

Ruger American Rimfire - My Review **I made a oops**

**In the below I note that I have the 18 inch barrel model, however, after actually measuring I ACTUALLY do have the 22 inch barrel model. I thought the one I got was the 18 inch model. The LGS was incorrect. I feel dumb. lol**

It's finally time to talk about the Ruger American Rimfire. Basically, it's a good gun for a good price but there are some things you need to watch out for. I got the standard model with the 18 inch barrel from an LGS. I mounted a 3-9x40 BSA Sweet .22 scope off of Amazon and used Weaver high rings from Wal-mart. For a budget gun, the Ruger American Rimfire is a good buy.


I like the gun for the most part. It shoots pretty accurately with the right ammo at 100 yards. I can usually get sub 4 inch groups with most mid range ammo and less than 2 inch groups with the higher quality ammo. The best I ever shot was less than .9 inch at 100 yards with Eley Club Xtra (I got lucky) but I usually get around 1.7 to 2.5 inch groups with the Eley. The trigger is possibly the best feature about the gun. It's crisp and adjustable down to around 3.5 lbs. I really like that it uses the same rotary magazine from the Ruger 10/22. If you had one of the BX-25 mags, you could use those as well. Removing the magazine is easy. Simply push on the tab in front of the trigger guard and the empty mag should fall right out. The action seems smooth and the tang safety is easily manipulated. Removing the bolt is also very easy. Open the action then press and hold the button on the left rear of the receiver, then just pull the bolt out of the receiver. The receiver has a dovetail type rimfire scope mount directly milled in but it also has holes drilled and tapped for a scope base. I ended up using the Weaver #12 mounts from Shopruger.com. The gun comes with 2 comb adapters for the stock. By unscrewing the rear sling mount you can remove the plastic insert. If you plan on using a scope you can use the high comb. If you want to shoot with the open sights you can use the standard comb. Speaking of the sights, we NEED to talk about them.

My biggest issue with this gun is likely particular to my gun but you should be wary of the one you are buying. My sights are messed up! The front sight's mounting hole was bored off axis to the right in addition to having been rotated clock-wise to the barrel axis. The screw hole also had severe burring that needed to be filed off but wasn't while at the factory. These burs kept the front sight from resting on the barrel and allowed the front sight to rotate with pressure. The dovetail cut for the rear sight was also cut clock-wise to the bore axis and the horizontal perpendicular cut wasn't cut correctly either. Basically, the factory screwed up in just about every way you could, on an open sight install. Thankfully, the scope mounts appear to have been cut correctly so using the scope hasn't been an issue. I only use the scope so I wasn't worried about sending it back but you NEED to be aware of this issue.

Other things to talk are the length of pull is too short for me and they don't make a comb to increase it (the gun has a 13.75 inch length of pull) so a custom replacement stock will be a thing. Swapping out the stock though isn't necessarily all that easy. The gun uses these 2 V-shaped bedding blocks that mate up with cut outs in the bottom of the receiver. The stock will need to have slots cut out for those blocks. Thankfully, Boys stocks already has an option for this rifle with those cut outs so it shouldn't be a big issue. The original stock isn't bad but the front is a little flimsy and will flex but for the most part, it's free floated. Another thing I don't like is that the barrel isn't replaceable. Maybe in the future it could be replaced but I have no idea. A bull barrel option would be totally awesome. However, you should note something important. When I use Remington Golden Bullet, sometimes I get gas leaking around the bolt and back into my face. When I extract the cartridge case, you can see where the burning powder left a sooty spot on the outer case wall as it vented. This is likely due to the case not expanding properly creating a sufficient seal with the chamber. I don't have this issue with any other ammo. It could be specific to the batch that I bought but I haven't found any other runs of RGB yet to see if the issue continues.

For the most part, the Ruger American Rimfire is a good gun for a good price. The other versions have threaded muzzles for devices, different barrel lengths, different stock options and can come in .22 Magnum and .17 HMR. My biggest suggestion for the gun is either they need to make a version with a bull barrel or make it so we can replace the barrel. I would totally buy another RAR if I could get a 22 inch bull barrel and maybe in .17 HMR. Otherwise I would likely purchase a Savage MKII or highly customized 10/22. If you want to know how the gun does over time, check back periodically as I work my way through my long range project. The RAR is the gun I'm starting with and will be used for other activities as well. I intend to shoot this gun for some time.

Pros -
  • The adjustable TRIGGER! I really like it
  • Uses 10/22 mags which are available just about everywhere
  • Comes with replaceable combs
  • Comes in .22 Long Rifle, .22 Magnum and .17 HMR
  • Street price is good at sub-$350
  • Reasonably accurate

Cons -
  • Watch out for QC issues like incorrectly installed sights
  •  Barrel not replaceable
  •  No bull barrel option (maybe they will have one in the future)