GREAT NEWS - The $0 Tax Stamps are Unconstitutional

The Gun Owners of America blog (along with numerous other outlets) is reporting the $0 tax stamps are unconstitutional. That said, it doesn't apply to everyone.

What makes this more interesting for me is that Palmetto State Armory and Silencer Shop are listed. I am a customer of both of these shops so I should be covered. I suspect that I will be able to purchase silencers without issue but I am waiting on further details on converting some of my firearms to what would have been "Short Barrel." 

My .22 bolt action project was already registered but I haven't chopped the barrel plus some other things I would like to make the change over to are under consideration.

While it's not the total victory of the destruction of the NFA that I want, this is a wonderfully practical step in the correct direction. Machine guns and destructive devices are still requiring the tax but this will majorly help with dismantling the nonsense argument favored by the anti-rights advocates who argue these are "Gangster Guns" and have no utility in "civil society."

Thank you Lord God above for restoring parts of our Rights that have been infringed! This is a prayer answered. All Glory to Lord God!

Update: No word yet on if the Fed's will appeal. They have until the 12th or 13th I believe it is as there is a stay on this going into effect. I would completely recommend joining the GOA as a member as then the ruling could apply to you. There is another case under Jensen v ATF that was joined with the Silencer Shop case so you might be covered in other ways. Stay tuned to see how this fully applies before you go buy or make something.

Update 2: There is one more day for the ATF/DOJ to appeal. Apparently, some members of Congress are pushing them to NOT appeal. That said, there is another case outside of this one that is preparing to be heard on the Second Amendment part of the NFA that could be a big deal. See Second Amendment Foundation's website.

Update 3: The DOJ did not appeal and the injunction has gone into effect. I would recommend waiting on guidance regarding what all of this means before you start sticking stocks on your AR or AK pistols. I am waiting for guidance as I am looking at doing just that. I also want to put the Pork Sword back to the 10.5 inch barrel but with a stock this time. I have so many things I want to do but I don't want to get messed up because of something I missed and now I have to back-date a bunch of Form 1s. I have reached out to some of the rights groups for guidance on what used to be the Form 1 process.

Update 4: Looks like I won't be putting stocks on any pistols soon. Georgia's laws/code says below.

• "(4) Possession of a sawed-off shotgun, sawed-off rifle, machine gun, dangerous weapon, or silencer by a person who is authorized to possess the same because he has registered the sawed-off shotgun, sawed-off rifle, machine gun, dangerous weapon, or silencer in accordance with the dictates of the National Firearms Act, 68A Stat. 725 (26 U.S.C. Sections 5841-5862);"

I have emails out to my state representatives to see if they can assist. It may just be time to remove these laws from the books before the next election this year. It may be too late to have Congress make the change needed. It might be that the GA AG will need to provide guidance or an opinion saying someone like myself is in compliance with those rules regardless of paperwork.

Mike Beliveau Has Passed

 Mike Beliveau was, to me, a smaller GunTuber that focused primarily on black power guns but his content was interesting. It wasn't flashy or fast-paced but featured heavy on history, which I like. What I hadn't known was that he was a writer who had been writing for almost as long as I have been alive. Sadly, Mr. Beliveau stated that he had pancreatic cancer earlier this year and eventually chose to not pursue treatment. 

It was announced by his son that he had succumbed to the disease in the morning on or around the 29th of July 2026.

I had no relationship with the gentleman but the people that I enjoy watching, reading from and respect are aging and are being swept up to the Lord's embrace. Sadly, it's starting to hurt after the loss of Paul Harrel.

Below is a link to Mr. Beliveau's website where he stores much of what he wrote.

Mr. Beliveau's website

Deer Season 2026-2027: Rifle Considerations

With the successes and failures of the 2025-2026 deer season, I have much to think about. It's become blatantly obvious that my favorite hunting setup has some sort of issue and can't be relied upon for hunting applications for the time being. Until I can dedicate time to fixing it, I'll need something more reliable that I can press into the Marlin 1894 CST's roll. The .270 project will most likely be that rifle but will take some time before I have the money to fully sort out the build. It's very unlikely that I will have it field-ready by season opening. 

The two primary choices are the Remington 700 Pork Sword build or the What Would Stoner Do Hunter build. Both of these are in .300 Blackout and are short range builds.

Some time ago, I zeroed the 700 for a subsonic loading from Discrete Ballistics but the observed velocities where close to 1100 fps. I will want to re-check to make sure the loads are still subsonic in the cooler temps come October. My biggest concern is having a critter run off into the neighbor's field since I haven't proven these loads yet. The lady that owns it is a fan of the critters and I would prefer to be a good neighbor and not start something with her. While not guaranteed, anchoring the animal is preferred to prevent social issues so an experimental subsonic load probably isn't the best option. Something supersonic seems like a better option for the time being.

The WWSD Hunter with the Wolfman

Previously, the WWSD Hunter build got a change to a General Purpose optics setup with a red dot and a 3x magnifier. The magnifier later got stripped for another roll and not long after that, the red dot came off. The previous 3-9x scope went back on along with the Dead Air Primal with a 9mm end cap.

In both cases, I could just verify either or both rifles with their current ammo selection and just give either a go on day one but also, in both cases, a change in ammo to something with a better data package could be an easy change over. Just buy some boxes and re-zero. My gut-feeling says I needed more research but an ammo change looked to be in order.

I have several boxes of the SIG Elite 120 grain copper hollow points but I have very little data supporting the SIG loads are good for a deer hunting application. There is, however, available open source data for other loads in .300 Blackout.

I had settled on Barnes's 120 grain VOR-TX offering with the Federal's Fusion 150 grain in second as the two top contenders in my running based on some of the testing videos available. I had ordered some of the VOR-TX loads and just need to zero once I have the time.

I'm hoping to setup a new deer stand on the Little Farm this year which should keep shots under 50 yards with there I am thinking of setting up. The 3-9x is way too much for this location but for this year, it'll just stay dialed back to 3x.

Stay tuned to see if everything works well.

The Marlin 1894 CST - An Update. Again.

 On opening day of deer season 2026, I ran into an issue with my beloved .357 Magnum Marlin 1894. The shot that I took should have been good but I couldn't find anything to indicate that I had hit my deer. I later setup a target at 100 yards and found the point of impact to be very high and to the left despite having confirmed zero a little before season open. This should not have been an issue. I made several adjustments ending with a good zero but after running a group to validate, I found that the zero had shifted again to the left several inches. I packed up and went home not wanting to waste more ammo.

I spent some time trying to find what was wrong. I made sure everything from the end cap on the Dead Air Primal to the Midwest Industries T1 mount was tight and they were. So far I have not found anything wrong. That said, I got a little froggy and decided that now is a good time to try an experiment. 

I had considered that an LPVO type optic could be a good match with the cartridge and rifle but I had never liked the excessive overhang from short eye relief scopes and the short Marlin receiver. The red dot in the Midwest Industries mount, so far, had been my favorite iteration of the setup overall but I did sort of miss the Leupold Ultralight FX-II 2.5x fixed scope for hunting. I had been considering that the issue I may have run into with the red dot was a parallax issue and maybe going back to a scope would mitigate that but I didn't want to go back to the 2.5x.

For me, the red dot truly made the rifle fun for plinking but that's more of a magnification related thing. The 2.5x scope didn't have that same magic that I found with the red dot. For the distances I hunt with the Marlin, there isn't a need for any real magnification and the 2.5x detracted from the fun which is why I went back to the red dot. At that point, I just concluded that it was better to have no magnification for my build since I could do everything I wanted. I still stand by that. I had looked several times for a true 1x type optic. I looked at muzzleloader optics and prism scopes but I hadn't found anything that did was I wanted that was still being made or looked good on a lever action rifle. Maybe if the micro prism scopes had a longer eye relief to keep the body over the receiver, I would have felt different.

I had known that Leupold makes a variable power scope similar to the 2.5x scope. They are not the same but similar. Thinking they were more similar than different, I ordered a Leupold VX-Freedom 1.5-4x20 for experimentation. The Ashley Performance mount was reused for this configuration. It turns out that I was wrong. The Leupold Ultralight 2.5x and V-Freedom 1.5-4x are not very similar.

Once in possession, I found the VX-Freedom 1.5-4x20 is a little heavier by 3 ozs and a little longer by about 1.75 inch compared to the FX-II. The windage and elevation adjustment part of the body is slightly larger as well. This has the effect of being just a little bulkier which meant the super low DD rings used for the FX-II were too low. I would need a pair of rings to match the new scope. While trying to order new rings, I found that Leupold has discontinued both the Low and Medium DD rings and I had to do some hunting on the Internet for remaining stock. I managed to source both Low and Medium height. While the Low rings cleared the mount, the hammer impacted the bottom of the scope so I switched to the medium rings. The body of the scope can't be moved forward enough to compensate as the adjustment ring would impact the rear most scope ring.

The immediate downside to the new scope is that the rig weighs 9.5 pounds which is up from 8.99 pounds. That's a lot of weight for a setup that's only meant for under 150 yards worth of deer hunting and something that was supposed to be easy to carry around the Little Farm. I already know that it won't be fun to truck around with as the Winchester weighed around that in the Timber Scout configuration. Thankfully, I don't do much lengthy spot and stalk hunting these days but still. Admittedly, most of the excess weight comes from the Dear Air Primal which is 21 oz and that .6 pounds or so could be shaved off by dedicating a Griffin Armament Sportsman 46 to the Marlin. That's a lot of money spent to shave off a little weight, especially given that I could go back to iron sights for free and save even more weight. I may just do that some day to free up the Primal for other stuff.

To bring us back out of the weeds, I took a short moment to test the scope setup and it didn't go well. While the test was very impromptu, I was still having the same issue where the point of impact would shift and I would chase zero. This brief test was only at 50 yards. After burning through around 15 rounds, I concluded that I needed to stand down.

For now, my beloved Marlin 1894 CST is unusable. I do want to spend more time on it but spare time to experiment is very scarce these days. For the 2026-2027 deer season, I am considering my options. 

My first reaction is to strip the rifle of all the goodies and put it back to stock then put it away but I think before I go to far, I should try a different cartridge to make sure it's not something with the ammo. I'll keep the Leupold in place for now. 

I had truly hoped the red dot was an issue but I'm struggling with what could be causing this issue. It will take time and good testing. It's very disheartening as this is one of my most favorite rifles.

New Product News: 45 Colt Is BACK in the Marlin 1894

Just in time for America's 250th birthday, Marlin finally released an 1894 in .45 Colt. The cartridge has long been waited by the community since Ruger brought Marlin back up after the Remington bankruptcy and Ruger's acquisition of the brand. They started with .44 Magnum which was Marlin's cartridge of choice for the return of the 1894 back in the 1960's. 

The newest iteration of the 1894 fleshed out various versions of the core rifle such as the Classic, SBL and Trapper but only offered the .44 and finally the .357 versions. While .45 Colt was never really an offering back before the 1900's for rifles, modern rifles chambered for .45 Colt have been reasonably available and is generally considered one of the 3 default options for pistol caliber lever action rifles. The old Winchester Center Fire (WCF) offerings are somewhat rare these days and are usually limited to the original WCF, the .44, also known as the .44-40.

The newest .45 Colt offering from Marlin is part of the Classic lineup but features stainless steel material with walnut stocks and a 20 inch barrel. It's the first stainless offering in the Classic line. It's priced about $300 more than the current Classic with the stainless construction but does feature text on the left side of the receiver that says "Made in the 250th Year of American Liberty."

I would say that is a pretty good way to bring about the .45 Colt back to the 1894.